Barriers to exit

Alberto Chong; Gianmarco León

doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

Barriers to exit

Alberto Chong, Gianmarco León

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo de revista › revisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.

Idioma original	Inglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)	93-97
Número de páginas	5
Publicación	Economics Letters
Volumen	99
N.º	1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002
Estado	Publicada - 1 abr. 2008
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Palabras clave

Development
Institutions
Labor
Passport costs
Trade

Acceder al documento

10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{2fc964cc54a54c849ee959a459e43890,

title = "Barriers to exit",

abstract = "Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.",

keywords = "Development, Institutions, Labor, Passport costs, Trade, Development, Institutions, Labor, Passport costs, Trade",

author = "Alberto Chong and Gianmarco Le{\'o}n",

year = "2008",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002",

language = "English",

volume = "99",

pages = "93--97",

journal = "Economics Letters",

issn = "0165-1765",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to exit

AU - Chong, Alberto

AU - León, Gianmarco

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.

AB - Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.

KW - Development

KW - Institutions

KW - Labor

KW - Passport costs

KW - Trade

KW - Development

KW - Institutions

KW - Labor

KW - Passport costs

KW - Trade

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=41149113860&origin=inward

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=41149113860&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

M3 - Article in a journal

SN - 0165-1765

VL - 99

SP - 93

EP - 97

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

IS - 1

ER -

Barriers to exit

Resumen

Palabras clave

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto