Barriers to exit

Alberto Chong; Gianmarco León

doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

Barriers to exit

Alberto Chong, Gianmarco León

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article in a journal › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	93-97
Number of pages	5
Journal	Economics Letters
Volume	99
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002
State	Published - 1 Apr 2008
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Development
Institutions
Labor
Passport costs
Trade

Access to Document

10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

Cite this

@article{2fc964cc54a54c849ee959a459e43890,

title = "Barriers to exit",

abstract = "Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.",

keywords = "Development, Institutions, Labor, Passport costs, Trade, Development, Institutions, Labor, Passport costs, Trade",

author = "Alberto Chong and Gianmarco Le{\'o}n",

year = "2008",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002",

language = "English",

volume = "99",

pages = "93--97",

journal = "Economics Letters",

issn = "0165-1765",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to exit

AU - Chong, Alberto

AU - León, Gianmarco

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.

AB - Unlike previous work on barriers to entry in international trade, we test four theories on barriers to exit, and find that macroeconomic and brain drain explanations explain them, while institutional and cultural hypotheses are not empirically robust. Findings are robust.

KW - Development

KW - Institutions

KW - Labor

KW - Passport costs

KW - Trade

KW - Development

KW - Institutions

KW - Labor

KW - Passport costs

KW - Trade

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=41149113860&origin=inward

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=41149113860&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.002

M3 - Article in a journal

SN - 0165-1765

VL - 99

SP - 93

EP - 97

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

IS - 1

ER -

Barriers to exit

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this