La problemática metodológica del fenómeno "inicial y regularmente" en la ontología-fundamental

This paper deals with the methodological problem referring to the ambiguous concept of «proximally and for the most part» in Heidegger's fundamental-ontology. On the one hand, it indicates that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in its pre-theoretical performance; on the other hand,
that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in the inauthenticity. This research will expose the methodological impossibility of exhibiting and demonstrating hermeneutic-phenomenologically that the Dasein generally exists inauthentic. Firstly, because it would imply a naive uncritical placement at the
starting point and, secondly, because hermeneutic phenomenology does not correlate to generalizations.