In the present article, the authors make an analysis of the importance of the precedent of mandatory observance in relation to the scope of article 5 of the Regulation of Environmental Protection of Mineral-Metallurgical Activities and its relation with the interpretative rules of Peruvian Law, especially the Principle of Typicity.
|Translated title of the contribution||The principle of prevention according to the Court of Environmental Enforcement: Resolution 21-2014- OEFA-TFA-SEP1 examined in the light of the Principle of typicity|
|State||Published - 2015|
- Derecho ambiental--Perú
- Fiscalización ambiental--Perú