TY - JOUR
T1 - Problem structuring methods as intervention tools: Reflections from their use with multi-organisational teams
AU - Alberto Franco, L.
PY - 2009/2/1
Y1 - 2009/2/1
N2 - Problem structuring methods (PSMs), also known as soft OR approaches, are most commonly employed with teams formed by members who tend to operate within an overall framework of authority and accountability, and most of whom have the 'power to act' on their recommendations. However, other PSM users include teams whose members are drawn from different organisational settings to work on a problem of common interest. The multi-organisational nature of such multi-organisational teams (MOTs) adds further complexity to the PSM modelling and facilitation processes by increasing the potential for conflict regarding the problem. In addition, members of MOTs tend not to operate within an overall framework of authority and accountability and, therefore, do not necessarily have full authority to commit themselves to their joint agreements. This paper reports on the design and application of a PSM-based methodology with three such groups, within the context of a multi-organisational collaboration in the UK construction industry. The paper reflects on the apparent success of the intervention, discusses the appropriateness of PSMs in this particular intervention context, as well as the generalisibility of the findings to other PSMs and/or multi-organisational contexts. Directions for the research and practice of PSMs with MOTs are also presented.
AB - Problem structuring methods (PSMs), also known as soft OR approaches, are most commonly employed with teams formed by members who tend to operate within an overall framework of authority and accountability, and most of whom have the 'power to act' on their recommendations. However, other PSM users include teams whose members are drawn from different organisational settings to work on a problem of common interest. The multi-organisational nature of such multi-organisational teams (MOTs) adds further complexity to the PSM modelling and facilitation processes by increasing the potential for conflict regarding the problem. In addition, members of MOTs tend not to operate within an overall framework of authority and accountability and, therefore, do not necessarily have full authority to commit themselves to their joint agreements. This paper reports on the design and application of a PSM-based methodology with three such groups, within the context of a multi-organisational collaboration in the UK construction industry. The paper reflects on the apparent success of the intervention, discusses the appropriateness of PSMs in this particular intervention context, as well as the generalisibility of the findings to other PSMs and/or multi-organisational contexts. Directions for the research and practice of PSMs with MOTs are also presented.
KW - Group decisions and negotiation
KW - Multi-organisational teams
KW - Organisational intervention
KW - Problem structuring methods
KW - Group decisions and negotiation
KW - Multi-organisational teams
KW - Organisational intervention
KW - Problem structuring methods
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=44849090023&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=44849090023&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1016/j.omega.2006.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2006.08.001
M3 - Article in a journal
SN - 0305-0483
VL - 37
SP - 193
EP - 203
JO - Omega
JF - Omega
IS - 1
ER -