Resumen
Public procurement of advertising is a matter of constant debate inmany countries around the world. At one point in Peru, during 2018, hiring privatemedia outlets to broadcast or publish state advertising was prohibited by law.Taking into account the ensuing controversy in Peru, this study assesses stateadvertising investment in the South American country, and examines whethercertain public entities (government ministries) have complied with the obligationsof justification, transparency and prohibitions provided for by the law that regu-lates state advertising. The findings of this study point to a worrying level ofnoncompliance. We display these results in a systematized manner and comple-ment them with a qualitative analysis of the justification given by public entitiesfor spending on advertising, as well as the accountability they provide (or shouldprovide)ex-post.
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 327-354 |
| Número de páginas | 28 |
| Publicación | ICL Journal |
| Volumen | 14 |
| N.º | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 9 dic. 2020 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
-
ODS 17: Alianzas para lograr los objetivos
Palabras clave
- Gastos públicos
- Publicidad estatal
- Obligaciones (Derecho)
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Hurting pockets: A case study of Peru’s legal obligations in transparency and justification of public expenditure in state advertising'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver