TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender inequity
T2 - Older workers and the gender labor income gap in Peru
AU - Cruz Saco, María Amparo
AU - Gil, Mirian
AU - Campos, Cynthia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the author(s); licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Using annual household surveys from 2004 to 2019, we examine the existence of a gender labor income gap among older persons in Peru. Two labor income models are estimated: Model 1 uses a basic set of demographic, socioeconomic, and personal characteristics as regressors (also called endowments); Model 2 uses the basic set plus additional personal characteristics. The Misner‐type relationship holds with positive returns for education and experience, and the anticipated association to the endowments. The Oaxaca‐Blinder decomposition yields an explained labor income gender gap of 44.4% (Model 1) and 51.5% (Model 2), i.e., controlling for endowments, approximately one half of the labor income difference remains unexplained and can be attributed to discrimination and labor segregation. In light of these results, we estimate Model 3 with two additional variables (head of household and beneficiary of intergenerational private transfer) which attempt to capture gendered stereotypes. With these two variables which provide information on gender discrimination the explained labor income gap for Model 3 is 71.1%—an increase of 19.6%. The unexplained component of the difference in labor income amounts to 28.8% that we attribute to unobserved variables that operate as post‐labor market elements in patriarchal societies. Results show that gender inequity during a woman’s life‐span manifests acutely among older women, which raises important implications for policy interventions.
AB - Using annual household surveys from 2004 to 2019, we examine the existence of a gender labor income gap among older persons in Peru. Two labor income models are estimated: Model 1 uses a basic set of demographic, socioeconomic, and personal characteristics as regressors (also called endowments); Model 2 uses the basic set plus additional personal characteristics. The Misner‐type relationship holds with positive returns for education and experience, and the anticipated association to the endowments. The Oaxaca‐Blinder decomposition yields an explained labor income gender gap of 44.4% (Model 1) and 51.5% (Model 2), i.e., controlling for endowments, approximately one half of the labor income difference remains unexplained and can be attributed to discrimination and labor segregation. In light of these results, we estimate Model 3 with two additional variables (head of household and beneficiary of intergenerational private transfer) which attempt to capture gendered stereotypes. With these two variables which provide information on gender discrimination the explained labor income gap for Model 3 is 71.1%—an increase of 19.6%. The unexplained component of the difference in labor income amounts to 28.8% that we attribute to unobserved variables that operate as post‐labor market elements in patriarchal societies. Results show that gender inequity during a woman’s life‐span manifests acutely among older women, which raises important implications for policy interventions.
KW - Aging
KW - Gender inequality
KW - Labor earnings
KW - Older persons
KW - Pension coverage
KW - Peru
KW - Gender inequity
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/cd282241-817c-3198-a6a5-e6ddb106032b/
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124146486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17645/si.v10i1.4783
DO - 10.17645/si.v10i1.4783
M3 - Article in a journal
VL - 10
SP - 35
EP - 45
JO - Social Inclusion
JF - Social Inclusion
IS - 1
ER -