TY - JOUR
T1 - Balancing speed and coordination
T2 - Senior leaders’ perspectives on civil service transformation during and after the pandemic
AU - Ali, Aisha J.
AU - Álvarez Calderón, Luis Álvaro
AU - Arcain Riccetto, Pedro
AU - del Carpio, Paola
AU - El Nouchi, Elise
AU - Fuenzalida, Javier
AU - Gómez, Margarita
AU - Hein, Aung
AU - Molina, Oswaldo
AU - Williams, Martin J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024/10/24
Y1 - 2024/10/24
N2 - How do governments’ responses to crises change their civil services and shape their future reform agendas? We address this question by conducting interviews with sources that are hard to access but uniquely placed to answer these questions: heads of civil service and similarly senior officials from 14 countries across six continents, speaking during the waning phase of the Covid-19 pandemic. Senior leaders perceived the central challenge of managing the crisis phase of the pandemic as balancing two competing imperatives: greater speed, flexibility, and decentralization of decision making, but also greater coordination and collaboration across teams and sectors. This required bureaucracies to question their largely hierarchical coordination methods and to transition toward network-based coordination mechanisms, agile methods, and new leadership styles. Senior leaders perceived these changes largely as accelerations of existing reform directions rather than ruptures, and were trying a range of methods to sustain and institutionalize these crisis-induced changes.
AB - How do governments’ responses to crises change their civil services and shape their future reform agendas? We address this question by conducting interviews with sources that are hard to access but uniquely placed to answer these questions: heads of civil service and similarly senior officials from 14 countries across six continents, speaking during the waning phase of the Covid-19 pandemic. Senior leaders perceived the central challenge of managing the crisis phase of the pandemic as balancing two competing imperatives: greater speed, flexibility, and decentralization of decision making, but also greater coordination and collaboration across teams and sectors. This required bureaucracies to question their largely hierarchical coordination methods and to transition toward network-based coordination mechanisms, agile methods, and new leadership styles. Senior leaders perceived these changes largely as accelerations of existing reform directions rather than ruptures, and were trying a range of methods to sustain and institutionalize these crisis-induced changes.
KW - Reforma del servicio civil
KW - Gestión de crisis
KW - Pandemia de COVID-19
KW - Coordinación gubernamental
KW - Descentralización
KW - Agilidad en el sector público
KW - Transformación del liderazgo
KW - Civil service reform
KW - Crisis management
KW - COVID-19 pandemic
KW - Government coordination
KW - Decentralization
KW - Public sector agility
KW - Leadership transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207513407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10967494.2024.2406430
DO - 10.1080/10967494.2024.2406430
M3 - Article in a journal
AN - SCOPUS:85207513407
SN - 1096-7494
JO - International Public Management Journal
JF - International Public Management Journal
ER -