Abstract
The golden rule says: ‘Treat others as you want to be treated’. This article organizes contemporary interpretations of the rule into three groups: the ‘material’ golden rule, the ‘relativistic’ golden rule, and the ‘formal’ golden rule. The article also argues that (a) the relativistic golden rule is the weakest, (b) the formal golden rule is virtually irrefutable, (c) the material golden rule is less evident than the formal one, but not necessarily false and (d) the formal golden rule and the material golden rule are not incompatible—they can complement each other. This assumes that the substantive assumptions of the material golden rule are real.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-15 |
| Journal | Journal of Human Values |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 21 Aug 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Management Centre for Human Values.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Ethics
- Global ethics
- Golden Rule
- Moral Law
- Moral values
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Which golden rule of ethics?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver