Abstract
In the present article, the authors propose a novel methodology for the identification and analysis of the speeches made by plaintiffs and judges in cases involving the recognition of trans* identities. Both conclude that these actors converge from rigid binary, pathologising and genitalising discourses, making very few references to the most recent contributions that the law and social sciences have made to the understanding of gender identity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Asian yearbook of human rights and humanitarian law |
| Editors | Javaid Rehman, Ayesha Shahid |
| Pages | 396-425 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Volume | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 11 Jul 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Brill | Nijhoff |
| Volume | 3 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2452-0578 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2019.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- binary speech
- genitalisation
- gender identity
- pathologisation
- Trans*
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Trans* Legalities: Preliminary Study of Files on the Recognition of Trans* Identities in Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver