Abstract
Using new data we analyze retrenchment programs before privatization, their effect on prices paid and re-hiring policies pursued by the new private owners. We find evidence in support of skimming and adverse selection. We find that some labor retrenchment policies have a negative impact on net privatization prices, even after taking sample selection bias and endogeneity into account. Some downsizing policies may lead to a higher frequency of post-privatization re-hiring. Skill-biased retrenchment programs are the only ones marginally associated with higher privatization prices and minimal re-hiring rates after privatization. But the political and economic costs of such programs may make them impractical.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1119-1130 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 9-10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Oct 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adverse selection
- Downsizing
- Labor
- Prices
- Privatization
- Re-hiring
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Privatization and labor policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver