Abstract
Modern Medicine understands the intersex body as a pathology that must be corrected. Each year, hundreds of intersex newborns and children are subjected to genital “normalizing surgeries”: unnecessary, non-consensual and irreversible medical procedures that seek to adapt them to the status quo of corporal virtue. In this text, the authors present the main domestic and international legal discourses built around this medical practice. They conclude that, compared to national systems, International Human Rights Law has been crystalizing a legal standard prohibiting these interventions, but that it is urgent to have a contentious case before an international tribunal that so orders.
| Translated title of the contribution | The other invisibles: Aiming for a legal narrative that prohibits “genital normalizing” surgeries |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 124-144 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Ius et Veritas |
| Issue number | 59 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Sex Characteristics
- Genital normalizing surgeries
- Discrimination
- Intersexuality
- Genital mutilation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The other invisibles: Aiming for a legal narrative that prohibits “genital normalizing” surgeries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver