Abstract
This paper presents evidence on the impact of labor regulations on income inequality using a recently published database on labor institutions and outcomes as well as different panel data analysis techniques for a large sample of countries for 1970-2000. When applying our preferred technique we find that both de jure and de facto regulations improve the distribution of income although the former appear to be non-robustly associated with improving income inequality. This result partly reflects the fact that regulations are endogenous and, more interestingly, that different regulation yield distinct effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-81 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Public Choice |
| Volume | 138 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- GMM-IV
- Income inequality
- Labor laws
- Long-run
- Regulation
- Rigidity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Labor market institutions and income inequality: An empirical exploration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 40 Scopus Citations
- 1 Erratum
-
Erratum to: Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration
Calderón, C. & Chong, A., 1 Jun 2011, In: Public Choice. 147, 3-4, p. 527 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Erratum › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver