La problemática metodológica del fenómeno "inicial y regularmente" en la ontología-fundamental

Translated title of the contribution: The methodological problematic about the phenomenon "proximally and for the most part" in the fundamental-ontology

Christian Ivanoff-Sabogal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle in a journalpeer-review

Abstract

This paper deals with the methodological problem referring to the ambiguous concept of «proximally and for the most part» in Heidegger's fundamental-ontology. On the one hand, it indicates that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in its pre-theoretical performance; on the other hand,
that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in the inauthenticity. This research will expose the methodological impossibility of exhibiting and demonstrating hermeneutic-phenomenologically that the Dasein generally exists inauthentic. Firstly, because it would imply a naive uncritical placement at the
starting point and, secondly, because hermeneutic phenomenology does not correlate to generalizations.
Translated title of the contributionThe methodological problematic about the phenomenon "proximally and for the most part" in the fundamental-ontology
Original languageSpanish
Number of pages21
JournalDaimon
Issue number10681
StatePublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The methodological problematic about the phenomenon "proximally and for the most part" in the fundamental-ontology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this