Abstract
Samuel Moyn’s latest book, Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, offers a compelling re-reading of the history of the laws of war not as the precursors of international humanitarian law, but as enablers of what he calls “inhumane war”. Instead of advancing the cause of humanization of war, Moyn argues in favour of pacificism and the abolition of war in its entirety. And yet, Moyn’s decision to tell his history through two interconnected but different parts – one on the broader history of the laws of war and another on the very recent present of US domestic politics – forces the book to embrace a North Atlantic, Anglo-American vision of international law that robs it of valuable insights from the Global South and its relationship to the same body of laws. In this review essay, I explore these missed connections seeking to offer a more global approach to the history of war and peace.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 345-360 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg, 2021
Keywords
- Anti-imperialism
- Global south histories
- History of international law
- Humanization of war
- Japan
- Latin America
- Laws of war
- Pacifism
- South Africa