¿Favorecen a las candidatas las listas abiertas o cerradas? Comparaciones entre Lima y las provincias en el Perú

Translated title of the contribution: Are open or closed lists better for women?: Comparing Lima and the provinces in Peru

Gregory D. Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle in a journalpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reviews the longstanding debate in the literature on electoral systems regarding the relative merits of open and closed lists for the election of women, describes the very different systems used in congressional and municipal elections in Peru, and examines gendered disparities between Lima and the provinces. A series of empirical comparisons demonstrates that the type of list is not of great importance in the capital, but that female candidates fare better under closed lists in the provinces, where the socioeconomic context and political culture are less supportive of women.
Translated title of the contributionAre open or closed lists better for women?: Comparing Lima and the provinces in Peru
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)155–181
Number of pages23
JournalApuntes
Volume47
Issue number86
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Creative Commons Attribution 3.0.

Keywords

  • Elections
  • Proportional representation
  • Women in politics
  • Electoral system
  • Peru

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are open or closed lists better for women? Comparing Lima and the provinces in Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this