Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cualificación ontológica y unidad de las maneras del ser

Translated title of the contribution: Ontological qualification and unity of the ways of being
  • Christian Ivanoff-Sabogal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle in a journalpeer-review

Abstract

This paper addresses two questions raised by Heidegger in The Fundamental Problems of Phenomenology. The first concerns the instance from which the ways of Being (existence, ready-to-hand, etc.) would be qualified as belonging to Being. The second concerns the apprehen-sion of the unity of Being given that it is characterised by a variety of ways. Heidegger leaves both questions unanswered; our research deals hermeneutically-phenomenologically with this challenge in two steps. First, the ontological qualification of the ways of Being as ways of Being is not achieved by subsuming them under a simple concept of Being, but by their de-termination as meaning and ground of beings; in this we show that they partially identify with Being itself. Second, the variety of the ways of Being finds its unity in the pre-ontological understanding of concrete Dasein, in which takes place the simultaneous openness of the existential way of Being and the categorical ways of Being.
Translated title of the contributionOntological qualification and unity of the ways of being
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)51-71
JournalStudia Heideggeriana
Volume14
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Heideggerianos. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Understanding of being
  • Hermeneutic phenomenology
  • Ground
  • Heidegger, Martin
  • Fundamental ontology
  • meaning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ontological qualification and unity of the ways of being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this