Abstract
Responsibility for bid rigging lies not only with cartel members or a corrupt public official. Legislators are also responsible. This paper critically analyzes some legal rules for public tenders that may facilitate anticompetitive practices, such as publication of public entities’ reserve price, the disclosure of the identity of contestants, contact between bidders and allowing consortiums without restrictions. Resting on comparative experience from OECD, Spain, Chile, Colombia, among others, the author proposes some reforms to favor competition in public procurement
| Translated title of the contribution | A contest without competition: Analysis of public bidding regulations that facilitate bid rigging |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 66-90 |
| Journal | Revista de Derecho Administrativo |
| Issue number | 18 |
| State | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
El siguiente artículo fue recibido por la Comisión de Publicaciones el 22 de noviembre de 2019 y aprobado para su publicación el 22 de junio de 2020.Bibliografía: páginas 89-90.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions -
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Cartel
- Competition
- Contest
- Public procurement
- Bid rigging
- Publicity
- Transparency
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A contest without competition: Analysis of public bidding regulations that facilitate bid rigging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver