Can cognitive skills and risk aversion explain inconsistent choices? An experiment

Research output: Working paper


We study the consistency of risk preferences among undergraduate students in a developing country. Our design allow us to elicit consistency at the individual level in which each subject selects his or her most preferred lotteries under two different (but related) risk elicitation tasks. In the first task, subjects choose one lottery out of six alternatives, thus ruling out inconsistency. Our second task is a transformation of the first task into a multiple price-list lottery, intended to examine whether the choice in the first task is also revealed as preferred. Using these choices, we construct our measures of preferences inconsistency, and analyze their correlation with cognitive skills (as measured by Frederick (2005)’s Cognitive Reflection Test—CRT scores and students’ GPAs) and risk preferences. We find that a low CRT score and a poor academic performance are, in general, good predictors of inconsistent choices. Results are mixed in terms of the role of risk aversion.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationPerú
Number of pages30
StatePublished - May 2016

Publication series

NameDocumento de Discusión


  • Cognición
  • Economía experimental
  • Riesgo (Economía)
  • Toma de decisiones


Dive into the research topics of 'Can cognitive skills and risk aversion explain inconsistent choices? An experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this