Abstract
The objective of this paper is to compare the rules of origin between the regional integration agreement Pacific Alliance and the Colombia free trade agreements with Chile, CAN and G3, in order to determine if there are significant differences between them. During this research, evidence shows that there are differences in the rules of origin among free trade agreements, this could generate incentives to the exporter in the position of choosing a specific trade agreement. The main conclusion is that not always the best option to export to Chile, Mexico or Peru is through the Pacific Alliance, as would be expected to be the most recent agreement. The choice of agreement depends on the merchandise to be exported, so it is recommended to look for the tariff subheading beforehand and to analyze which treaty would be most beneficial to export, according to its characteristics and composition
| Translated title of the contribution | Comparative analysis of rules of origin in member countries of Pacific Alliance and Free Trade Agreements |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 2-34 |
| Journal | Journal of Business |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Alianza del Pacífico (Organización : América Latina)
- Integración regional
- Tratados comerciales
